To the 99% and #OccupyWallStreet

This weekend, in support of the folks at Occupy Wall Street and similar in other major financial centers (including Occupy LA here in Los Angeles), I put the full content of "Economic Resilience" online for free readership. This how-to document for building local community resilience has been freshly updated with new links and additional ideas.

Some other thoughts, specifically addressed to the #Occupy protesters and the themes that are recurring in signs and posters:

1) Understand the core of the crisis

The economic crunch that stimulated the #Occupy movement is only a symptom of something much, much bigger. What you call "hoarding wealth" is a global-scale Ponzi scheme, that is right now crumbling in on itself and affecting all of us. You're camped out at Wall Street and financial locations -- the home of the presumption of growth. This presumption is the fatal flaw in the American economic system -- the idea that "growth" can continue forever, when we all live on one small, finite, limited planet. 

Humanity is simultaneously experiencing peak oil, peak natural gas, peak coal, peak copper, peak uranium, peak phosphorus, peak fresh water, peak arable land, and more. Richard Heinberg calls it “peak everything.” (YouTube) The debt crisis began the unravelling of business-as-usual, but there simply aren't the planetary resources to continue the more-more-more globalized economy. We are experiencing the time of The Great Turning, a transformative change in our views about everything around us and how humanity fits into it.

2) Rethink "Jobs"

Many of the signs and posters in the media and on #Occupy websites demand "jobs." Think it through, what you are asking for. For the government to provide "jobs" means mortgaging and shackling your children's future. The government has to fund "stimulus" with borrowing. They would have to borrow funds from a leaner future to spend now in an age of plenty. (And as we navigate the financial crises to come, today will certainly feel like abundance and plenty.) That's craziness.

Wall Street doesn't have "jobs" to offer you, and they'll be axing more and more as this crisis unfolds. The role of “employee” of a giant facility controlled by corporate executives is part of the fading past. Even many “green jobs” are tied into the fatally-flawed eternal growth presumption. In the immediate future, making a living is much more likely to be as “proprietor,” rather than employee.  It's time to think about what you can offer, locally within your home community, goods and services that address the basic Maslovian needs of food, water, shelter, and security. (learn more)

3) Boycott Wall Street

When you go down to your local #Occupy action, rather than a brand-name sporting goods sleeping bag, take Grandma's handmade quilt. Rather than the department store fashion sweater, barter for the handmade one knitted by the woman in the next tent. Rather than brand-name convenience foods, buy farmer's market produce from local farmers.

If it comes from a chain store, it's funding Wall Street. If it comes from a "discount" store, you can be sure it's contributing to labor injustice and very possibly to humanitarian atrocities. Quit funding the Wall Street system with your buying dollar, and instead vote for a sustainable, locally self-sufficient future.

Buy local: support local businesses, support local farmers. Convince your local businessmen to shift to local suppliers, and bank your money locally where it can be invested in your neighborhood. Right now Local won't survive if we don't buy from them. And in the near future, as the globalized economy crumbles, Local will be all that we will have. Support Local because we need it to survive.

4) Take back America

The "heartbeat of America" is not Chevy trucks -- that's Madison Avenue and Wall Street convincing you it is so. iPhones aren't "hot" -- global warming is, exacerbated by the globalized economy spurring it on. WalMart, with its labor abuse and massive market controls, isn't "living better." We CAN "imagine" life without Monsanto. Scotts/Ortho poison vendors are far from "garden experts." And "health" isn't the chemicals and barbaric procedures of Pfizer and Kaiser Permanente. It's time to quit giving ourselves and our children over to the corporate say-so.

The true heartbeat of America is you and me. It is small businessmen and local family-owned, family-run farms. It is the local traditional healer, of diverse modalities, before corporate America sold us a bill of goods that these life-affirming ways weren't good enough. It's time for us --the 99%-- to take them back. ("Peak everything" plus economic collapse says we will have to anyway.) It's time to reclaim our traditional heritage, that America is the land of pioneers and hard work and do-it-yourself.

5) Reskill for the new future

In your time spent in tent cities, begin learning the new skills necessary for the new future: a post-petroleum, economically-lean, low-consumption, low-carbon, necessarily-localized, socially-just future. Food: Learn to grow food, to cook it, to preserve it, and to share your bounty with others. Clothing: Learn to sew, to knit, to weave, to scavenge fiber from the remnants of cast-off industrially-produced fabrics. Shelter: Learn to build with found materials like urbanite, earth forms and scavenged lumber. Learn how to capture rainwater and compost (all) waste. Finances: Take back control from the banking system. Learn how much can be achieved WITHOUT the U.S. dollar via barter, time banking, LETSystems, sharing arrangements, co-ops and local community-based investment. Community: Learn the skills of consensus, conflict resolution, true listening, and sharing, and deepen connections within your home neighborhood. We -- the 99% -- are going to need all these skills as we leave these brief few decades of excess and plenty.

6) "Tax the rich"

Again, realize what you are asking for. It's an admirable concept, but very, very difficult to really achieve. The rich have unlimited ability to hire tax accountants and attorneys. They will swiftly design ways around any tax you are able to get the politicians to put in place (and that latter part will be very hard to achieve as well).

A few suggestions for what to campaign for, from someone who used to be a tax accountant: (a) Demand caps on pay scales like some European countries have, where any indivicual top exec can only earn a multiple of what the person at the bottom of the pay scale earns. In Mondragon Spain, that multiple is 15 times. Rather than a "tax," this one is a wage cap.  (b) At the same time, don't let them decrease corporate tax rates. Use existing payroll tax definitions of reportable wages (including excess life insurance, excess health insurance, and other benefits) to impose the wage cap. Remove the wage maximum on Social Security and Medicare withholding, and withhold from all wages -- that will fund Grandma for a bit longer.  (c) Use existing tax structures instead of creating new ones; new ones come with more government bureaucracy which we all have to pay for.

All this taxation becomes available funding. It's critical that this funding gets spent on the right stuff: building local resilience that will enable us to weather the changes ahead. As we leave the brief era of petroleum -- when energy supplies were very cheap and plentiful and allowed us to do amazing things -- we find ourselves dreadfully unprepared for the realities of life. Most of us alive today don't know how to grow food locally, in cities, where most of the people are. Land is at a premium and is tied up in private ownership. Water supplies in cities are dependent upon massive infrastructure which isn't adapted to life with much less energy and oil. Most U.S. dwelling units are insufficiently insulated against cold and hot weather.  We have to transform all these things, and grow our local skill base. And the "stimulus" from "taxing the rich" is the best chance we have to prepare for life in the future.

7) Occupy leadership

Have you noticed that nearly all the political candidates come from the 1% ... Where are our 99% options? Where are the candidates who understand "peak everything" and how to adapt to it? Our current political structure is geared so that only the wealthy and the Wall-Street-supported can afford to run. Massive campaign finance reform will need to be part of any enduring change. That said, given the thoughts expressed on these ideas by insiders like James Gustave Speth, I doubt we can do much -- particularly with what we have to work with, and within the timeframe we have left. (link to expanded discussion)

I haven't journeyed down to OccupyLA myself. In part that's because it is quite a distance from me, and I have kids' schedules to uphold. But deep down, those are simply excuses; really, my heart's not in it. I see the Occupy movement as an outbursting of emotion, expressing that the existing System is horribly broken, a sentiment with which I wholeheartedly agree. But the protests, now shifting to from Wall Street to upscale neighborhoods, are a gigantic "blame game" which cannot possibly fix anything real. (See my bullet #1 above)

Joanna Macy points out that it will take 3 types of action to achieve The Great Turning:  (Macy's explanation on YouTube)

  1. Stopping action, to stop further destruction.
  2. Creating new structures, building the path of the future, what the Transition movement strives to achieve.
  3. Change in consciousness, addressing our inner landscape and our deepest identity. 

The #Occupy movement is perhaps a weak form of Macy's action #1.  I say "weak" because with its multiple-topic agenda it isn't a very powerful force to achieve much of anything except Drama at the moment, and perhaps violence in the future. It's like a badly adjusted shotgun, not focused on a specific target. Maybe a pellet or two will hit, but most will miss the mark and probably make a considerable mess. Meanwhile, the few discernable targets (Wall Street, high-wealth individuals, politicians) hold little true ability to create transformative change.

Instead, I turn my personal energies toward building, Macy's action #2. Within the Transition movement we're trying to figure out what will be needed to conduct life in the post-peak era. All the conventional systems must evolve and change.  And we the people -- the 99% -- are the ones who have to do it.

Within the Transition movement, we too are the 99%.  We're out here in U.S. communities, creating food gardens, water storage, alternative economic systems, holistic health care, changing education. We're putting new practices in place, right now, so that they can gain some traction and begin to help.

No, what we're doing isn't nearly so flashy as signs and protestors marching up and down the streets. In fact, it's rather a quiet movement, with some very deep roots, deep thinkers doing societal redesign work, resulting in some very deep rearrangements of what-once-was in our society. If you really want to create change, come join us. We've got lots of work to do.

(note: The above thoughts are personal opinion, not necessarily the views of the international Transition movement or Transition US)

Joanne Poyourow is actively involved in Transition Los Angeles and blogs at Transition United States. She is the author of "Economic Resilience: What we can do in our local communities," as well as two books on Transition-type topics.

6 comments

 
nomorecontrol wrote 1 year 17 weeks ago

Ponzi Scheme Economic System

The economic system (model or game whatever you wish to call it) is no more than a Ponzi Scheme that is reaching its final days before collapse. The modern economic system has over millennia been created, modified and manipulated by the rich elite for the rich elite. It is not sustainable as there is far too much waste, the population has limits as we see today and it is based on greed not need. Too much hording of wealth increases national debt and takes needed resources and money from the people that really need it... the poor.

Greed is NOT sustainably without elements of human suffering.

The new economic system needs more than change. It must be completely revamped to cater to a need society rather that the greed society we have today. Unfortunately the 2% of the population that own 98% of the worlds resources and wealth like the narcissistic megalomaniac lifestyles that they live and are not willing to step down. But more than money itself, the power over others is addicting and is in most cases the driving force of these sociopaths we call leaders.

In order to facilitate the foundations for a fair and just society, the economic system must be able to:

Ensure that all people have the elementary needs to live a healthy life by providing the basics of life such as housing, food, education (not today's education as that is a joke), healthcare, communications and transportation which are today the basics of modern life. Only by ensuring each and every person in society starts on an equal footing so to speak can we be assured progression through society is based solely on the persons willingness to educate him/herself and personal motivation. As long as there is "Money" we will never be free.

Only inside such an economic system can the people flourish with creativity as money is no longer the basis of action rather the action is based solely on need and desire rather than cost. Those who appose such a change in the economic system with a plethora of "It won't work excuses" are still committed to the greed rather than need system as money is power and it is the power over others that man is addicted to not so much the wealth.

The elite never share as they have never had to.
The elite kill themselves in financial crisis rather than be poor... (1929 Stock crash saw many suicides of the wealthy)
The elite care not for human life but only the profit it provides.
The elite rarely fight in a war... we are the cannon fodder they take the rewards earned in our blood.

http://nomorecontrol.org
Foundations For Terran Society...

 
Joanne Poyourow wrote 1 year 20 weeks ago

Ashley Sanders: How Occupiers can keep going

My response to all of these comments was brilliantly stated by Ashley Sanders http://www.truth-out.org/populism-isnt-dead-its-marching-what-bunch-farm... Ashley uses different keywords than I tend to do, but I embrace her basic ideas.

Ashley completely hooked me in with her paragraph "Suggestions: Occupy (your) neighborhoods." There she speaks to the core of what I am passionately engaged in every day.

In the paragraph about "aesthetic anarchists," I yearn to hand Ashley the term "localize," but I agree with her message. Yes, inherit ideas, but then customize them to what is needed in the place where you are. Localize your inheritance. This is what we in the Transition movement have had to do constantly. Perhaps we had an easier time of it because our initial "rhizome" didn't come from U.S. soil but from a different country with a slightly different political/social matrix. Here in L.A. I joke about having to "translate" from the British.

When it comes to a "Plan" or "ideology" (Ashley's words), Occupy groups might want to seek out their local Transition groups. Many of the U.S. Transition groups have been working for quite some time to democratically identify aspects of what ingredients will need to be in their local community's plan. Admittedly, in most U.S. communities at this point these plans are yet incomplete, but these plans represent a body of work built upon a radically different understanding of the world than Corporate America's. This work that has gone before might serve as very useful in informing Occupy's route forward.

In her Questions following the section called "The Complicity Complex," Ashley asks some very perceptive (and uncomfortable) questions about government which I have been thinking about for a long while, but which I haven't been able to put into words. She did a nice job of it. Within the Transition movement, we so so much valuable work on implementing solutions within so many of the petals of David Holmgren's Permaculture Flower, but we deftly step over that "governance" petal. Readers within the Transition movement need to consider Ashley's questions deeply.

I agree with a ton of the rest of what Ashley is saying. Furthermore, I am very eager to roll up my sleeves and get down to work with people who want to make those ideas come alive. The prospect of doing this is scary -- it takes me outside my comfort zone. Yet Ashley's words are a reminder we cannot do this work and get comfy. As soon as we achieve that sense of comfortable, it is time to push the edges a bit further.

Thank you Ashley, for pushing my edges.

 
Str8sh00ter wrote 1 year 20 weeks ago

Supporting your argument

Joanne, I wholeheartedly support your discussion above. I think it comes down to truly transitioning to a new form (or old form in a new light) of protest. The Occupy movement has many admirable goals, however they are trying to use a broken system that has been highly institutionalized with thuggery and favoritism to fix the problem of thuggery and favoritism. This can easily be seen in just the financial world by looking to Goldman Sachs which has more ties into both parties of the government than should ever be considered favorable. One point that I have been trying to make to my friends you made very clear above. We are looking to the 1% to solve the problems that we blame that same 1% for. They are happy with the equation and, without resorting to force, we will not be able to unseat them from their logic. The vast majority of politicians are "rich" and therefore are not interested in changing anything except the mindset of the poor. One change I strongly support are term limits on all public servants. No more than two terms should be held by anyone in office (one would be ideal) to avoid the corporate tie-ins to the public arena that currently exist. Politicians are no longer beholden to the constituents at the federal level, the are beholden to the donors (read: special interests). To truly change this society we will have to push from the bottom up, that is locally change and in the process enlist enough other localities to support change on a massive scale.

 
steveh wrote 1 year 20 weeks ago

Occupy Movement

Hi, Joanne;

I just read your blog post on the Occupy Movement and while I agree that the movement may seem presently scattered in its focus, you may be shortchanging a nascent movement that is definitely attracting a large, diverse and experienced spectrum of activists. So it seems a stretch to start making assumptions about how "weak" this relatively new movement is. Perhaps in the interim since you wrote the above article you've changed your mind. I hope so. It seems a little prejudiced since you admitted "(you) haven't journeyed down to OccupyLA..." Maybe you should seek them out? Spend some time exploring their process, their concerns and their intentions deeper than "...protests, now shifting to from Wall Street to upscale neighborhoods, (as) a gigantic "blame game" which cannot possibly fix anything real."

I'd urge you to check out Dee Hock's Chaordic model, which envisions various states of development in that organizational model, progressing from apparent chaos to varying degrees of order, becoming more and more refined as it grows. If you think of it, it's an "organic" model in the same sense that our universe may have followed from the Big Bang to now. Even at this point novas are happening, gas clouds are forming and stars and planets may be coming into being - perhaps even to evolve to life sustaining forms.

The Occupy movement may seem disorganized, unfocused or "weak" on the surface to an outsider but I'd suggest not making any long range judgments about the power of the movement or of those participating in it. Allow me an opportunity to give a personal example:

I'm a 65 year old male activist, a Vietnam Vet who filed for CO status in 1968 while stationed in Nam. I've marched in protests every decade since the sixties struggling, often in vain, against war and social injustice. I've also been an elected state and national delegate in the Green Party - the Party that really offered this nation real change (probably sooner than it was ready - because maybe we needed 8 years of GWB to "get it.")

For 6 years I've been actively involved in a local, action oriented group called Local 20/20, much like the Transition Movement (in fact, we are in the process of applying for Transition Town status even though we've been in existence before the TT movement came to the US.) In that organization, we organized a successful local initiative campaign to acquire the grid from a for-profit utility so we could control rates and outage restorations at the local level through our Public Utility District. I've also worked on a successful statewide initiative for a Renewable Energy Portfolio. Currently, I'm a newly minted member of our local Occupy Port Townsend Movement. I offer these as an example of the kind of person that is attracted to this Occupy movement. And I'm hardly alone.

Mainstream media, by its very profit-oriented, sound bite nature, has inadequately explored the depth and range of abilities, ideas and approaches in the Occupy Movement, though they seem to be catching on little-by-little. In our local Occupy Movement, we are working through the various communication models and actions the national Occupy Movement has been exploring. This is an evolving process but, even in our small community, we have a wide range of participants from young unmarrieds to young families with babies to older folks ranging from their mid-thirties to those in their 70's. Creating a synergy among these diverse nodes of activists is both exciting and challenging. I'm also glad to say that I've met young folks who been traveling the country, checking out various Occupy Movements, who've got more organizational skills and understanding of the process than I will ever have. The fact is, among these folks, we have a wide range of organizational skills and abilities.

In our process, we have already created working groups that are addressing issues like dealing with local foreclosures; creating networking systems from "Mic Check!" to listservs to social networking across the globe; initiating local city and county actions to pass a resolution to amend the Constitution rescinding corporate personhood and remove corporate financing from our electoral process; to moving personal and business checking and savings accounts out of Big Banks to local community banks and credit unions. Most importantly we are examining failed paradigms, looking at changing them. We accept that none of these will be fully realized in the short term. Nor are we intimidated by the fact that others have tried and failed. Persistence is the hallmark of change. Perhaps the difference between the sixties and now is that our species may have reached a critical mass of growing consciousness, directing it's energy at creating a more just and equitable system, and coming from a much broader spectrum of social consciousness.

I see the TT Movement and the Occupy Movement as two arms on the same body, two hemispheres of the same brain. Both of those will be needed to address the enormity of the issues we face. We have created a mess and there is much resistance to change. Fortunately there is also a growing movement addressing that resistance.

None of us think this is going to be easy or accomplished in the short term. I certainly don't expect to be alive when the majority of such efforts are achieved. But it's great to be a part of the process, meeting young folks who know far more than I did at their age of the challenges they face. I encourage you to support them even if your process is different.

Best regards,

Steve

 
1inthe99 wrote 1 year 24 weeks ago

The Audacity

Wow, you've got some audasity to preach to a movement that you know nothing about. Don't pretent to know us, or judge us. Like by saying what blankets to use, and tell us about shopping locally, and global warming, and all the other b/s your assuming we don't already know. And I love how you try and dis-courage the movement by telling us how much power and money the government and poiticians have to fight us with. We "get it" that's why were involved in this GLOBAL movement which has already seen sucesse's abroad. For instance, Egypt, Lybia, and hopefully Syria is next in line. But as far as the American part of this uprising, we will stick to our mission of a leaderless revolution. There are many reasons for this, allow me to share just a few. 1.) The reason the media and politicians, and I guess you, are constantly asking us, who are your leaders, and what are your demands. They do this so they have a target to take down, and more importantly so that they can perscribe us to a certain ideology. This is the same reasons they ask for our demands. Well first I object to the language the 1% uses. "demands", the only time you hear a call for a list of demands is if terrorists have taken something over, or taken hostages. Or in a situation with criminals in a standoff with police. So we have zero demands. But if we put leaders in place we would immediatly dis-enfranchize our very own people. And if we gave a list of things we want to accomplish, or our core beliefs, they would subscribe us to an ideology so there could be something they can either say how wrong we are or how right we are. This is how our current system works. i.e. If we came out tomorrow and stated we were Pro-life, their would be a backlash from people who are Pro-choice. And vice-versa. But the truth is we have people in the 99% who are Pro-choice and some that are Pro-life. WE WILL NOT BE CO-OPTED by the media by politics or anything. I know the state controlled media likes to assume were Democrats. And quite simply we are not. We think the left is corrupt, as well as the right. So our choice is to go straight. We believe in our right to vote and we think it's is a Constitutional duty. But when it comes to who we vote for we will not be looking for a little d or a little r to help us. No, it does not matter what Party your in, it's what actions you take. i.e. I live in Colorado and our Governor is a Democrat. But he has made the decsion to use force against our peaceful occupation in Denver. So he will not have another term here in CO. We will vote against the people based on their performance. And as far as trying to come up with our own canidates like the Tea Party did. We wholly disagree with that. Our government has a sickness, and unfourtunatly for them it's terminal. So we will continue on the same road of the countries I mentioned, and on the same path as Martin Luther King Jr, JFK, Ghandi, and all those who only found change through resistance of the ruling class, and equally stay activists who target with a laser the 1% who are criminals, and we will do everything in our power to remove them from power, and take our country back. We've only been active together for three months but we are not going to stop until our Government is beholden to it's people. We are the 99%. We will continue our fight even if people don't understand it. We will not stop for the police dept., or anyone who chooses to obstruct us. We will have liberty or death. Anyways I could go on, but I don't see the point. Trust me you are not one of us. Were cut from a very sacred cloth. And you cannot co-opt our movement for your green agenda. We are aware of the threats of global warming and all other issues concerning our planets health, and we are not neglecting it. But we don't want to be partnered with you, because you are blind to our larger mission. and you may wish us or try to forsee our downfall but were not worried so neither should you. We should make a rule that if you havn't spent night after night in an encampment, or been attacked by police in riot gear at least twice, you should shut the fuck up. You do not share in our sufferings, therfore you will not share in our glory. PEACE, 1 in the 99

 
Joanne Poyourow wrote 1 year 24 weeks ago

"In any movement, you have to

"In any movement, you have to have some simple demand around which you galvanize forces." -- Martin Luther King

Please register or login to post a comment.

Newsletter Signup

Donate

User login