Blogs

"Walk your talk," I've written here and elsewhere.  Even as we work to "change the world," we must still be rethinking and changing our own lives too.  And in that vein, two weeks ago our family took yet another (major) step along the path by bringing 4 young chickens into our lives!

I say "major" step because in the first few days we novice chicken owners have had to learn everything from how to clip wings (thank you You Tube!) to how to prevent severe pecking.  I'll recommend City Chicks by Patricia Foreman -- her book deals specifically with the issues we encounter in the city that country folks probably don't have to bother with.

First off, realize that we do indeed live in the city.  My house is about 6 blocks from LAX international airport.  Yes, you can have chickens in L.A. ... hens, that is.  (There is a city ordinance that supposedly "allows" a rooster, but when you read it you'll discover that basically nobody has a property big enough to qualify).

Here is a guest blog post from Erik Lindberg of Transition Milwaukee in Wisconsin. Originally posted here.

A couple of weeks ago, I was invited to speak at Transition Mill Valley's debut event "Resilience from the Ground Up! A community's positive response to peak oil and climate change". It was held in the historic downtown Throckmorton Theater, a lovely atmospheric building, with intimate seats around small tables, and a warm inviting stage.

Within the body of Transition movement literature, I don't often see references to the Simple Living or Voluntary Simplicity movement.  Perhaps the Voluntary Simplicity movement is less active in the places that Transition founders Rob and Naresh have lived.  Perhaps it is because at its origins, Voluntary Simplicity focused more on individual choices and individual changes than on community-centric and societal-transformation ones.  I can only speculate.

This week I picked up a small book at my public library, Less is More, edited by Cecile Andrews and Wanda Urbanska.  Its collection of essays focus on "Simplicity," but they are (as our British friends would say) "spot on" about the inner journey of Transition.  I strongly recommend this book as a part of Transition literature.

Here is a guest blog post from Shauna Struby of Transition OKC in Oklahoma, originally posted here.

Ahhh the wide-ranging highs and woes of waking to our world. Just two days before the 350 Garden Challenge, I sat in a Climate Congress with accomplished civic and non-profit leaders, some of whom are responsible for helping Sonoma County set national-precedent with our innovative and inspiring climate goals and work. While there is much to celebrate, the harsh reality of the climate report card is that we are getting an F. Collectively we are failing at the most obvious choice we have to make, which will impact life on this planet for the next thousand years.

We're videotaping shows in the Pacific Northwest this August-September 2010.
We'd love your help as we plan our trip.

In her Commentary and her Critique of the Transition Initiative/Network, Lorna Salzman questions the role of government and Transition.  Ms. Salzman asserts that the Transition approach omits government.  As I will attempt to explain below, our approach is far from that.

Rather, the difference between our approaches is one of whether we believe that government is the answer.  Do we trust that government will solve peak oil + climate change + economic contraction?  Do we believe that government will prepare the citizenry in time?  In a word: No. 

Ms. Salzman, on the other hand, seems to trust quite solidly in our government's ability to handle these issues.  Her belief in government -- and its power to create change -- goes so far that at two points in the past she personally ran for major public offices.

Within the Transition movement we assert that, at a minimum, preparing for the effects of peak oil + climate change + economic contraction will be a top-down-plus-bottom-up process.  Taking that a step further, we aren't planning to sit around and wait for government to do it for us.  We don't believe that they will take the lead in this matter (for a variety of reasons, some of which Ms. Salzman has already named).  In fact, we operate with the understanding that in most cases, our government will likely be a latecomer to the action.  It's up to concerned citizens to get the ball rolling.

A bit of backstory here:  In the May 3 issue of The Nation magazine, Lorna Salzman ran a full-page advertisement critiquing Bill McKibben and 350.org for not telling us HOW to reduce CO2 concentrations to 350ppm.  (read the letter here)  I wrote a reply, "How to get to 350ppm," in which I pointed out that McKibben and 350, like Al Gore, are all in the business of awareness-raising, and that it is other organizations -- namely Transition Initiatives -- which are shouldering the burden of How To.  Below is Ms. Salzman's second piece, "A Critique of the Transition Initiative/Network," posted with her permission. My reply is here.

A Critique of the Transition Initiative/Network

   Like me, most of you probably never heard of The Transition Initiative or Transition Network or Transition Towns, founded in the UK by Rob Hopkins, a permaculture advocate and decentralist. The TI has indisputably important aims: guiding communities through the soon-to-end fossil fuel era into an era of self-reliant sustainability in which the means of survival devolve onto small communities.

A bit of backstory here:  In the May 3 issue of The Nation magazine, Lorna Salzman ran a full-page advertisement critiquing Bill McKibben and 350.org for not telling us HOW to reduce CO2 concentrations to 350ppm.  (read the letter here)  I wrote a reply, "How to get to 350ppm," in which I pointed out that McKibben and 350, like Al Gore, are all in the business of awareness-raising, and that it is other organizations -- namely Transition Initiatives -- which are shouldering the burden of How To.  Below is Ms. Salzman's first piece, a commentary on my "How to get to 350ppm." (Ms. Salzman's text is posted with her permission.)  My reply is here.

Ms. Poyourow's response to my Open Letter to Bill McKibben is well taken inasmuch as there is nothing in it that I would take issue with,  per se. Nonetheless, my experience as an environmental organizer and activist has brought me into this issue from an entirely different direction. Furthermore, I suspect that McKibben's own areas of expertise, mainly writing and lecturing, brought him in from a different direction.

Syndicate content

Newsletter Signup

Donate

User login